Why is Times of India covering the hollywood racket, not google, tata’s, NTRO, CBI SEX, bribery racket for R&AW/CBI jobs

Unlike Hollywood , NTRO, CBI, indian security agencies, casting couch, SEX bribes for R&AW jobs remains a well kept secret
The times of india in a classic example of indian HYPOCRISY is covering the Hollywood sexual harassment in great detail, however it refuses to carry any news of the google, tata’s, NTRO, CBI SEX, bribery racket for R&AW/CBI jobs
Just as women who are sexually harassed are potrayed as victims, women like a google competitor who was denied the income and opportunities she deserved because she refused to offer SEX, money bribes to the extremely corrupt shameless fraud NTRO, CBI, R&AW employees is also a victim of sexual exploitation
For example google, tata, NTRO, R&AW, CBI have got 10 lazy greedy mediocre google, tata sponsored goan sex workers, cheater housewives and other frauds R&AW/CBI jobs falsely claiming that they are online experts, domain investors at the expense of the google competitor, domain investor, which is completely FAKE

Some questions which can be asked for each of these 10 google, tata sponsored fraud R&AW/CBI employees faking a btech 1993 ee degree
– have they invested any money online in domain names, webhosting?
– have they made any money online?
– have they answered JEE ?
– have they worked as engineers?
– do they legally have their own paypal account linked to their PAN number ?

The answer to all the above questions is no, clearly indicating that there are other considerations for NTRO employees falsely claiming that these women, lazy frauds are online experts, domain investors, paypal account holders and were their btech 1993 ee classmate.Domain investors worldwide claim that some young google, tata sponsored goan women, like siddhi mandrekar, sunaina chodan , have got R&AW jobs only for having sex with powerful indian government employees who then abuse their powers to make fake allegations without any proof against the real domain investors and the falsely claim that these sex workers own the domains of a private citizen.